On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:14 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Doesn't that discrepancy already exist as the code stands, because
> startup_progress_phase_start_time is also set in
> has_startup_progress_timeout_expired()?
I don't think it is, actually.
> I realize that was an example, but the
> issue se
Hi,
On 2023-01-03 13:33:34 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 7:36 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > What is the use case for an absolute start time plus a relative
> > interval?
>
> The code snippet that you indicate has the important side effect of
> changing the global variable star
On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 7:36 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> What is the use case for an absolute start time plus a relative
> interval?
The code snippet that you indicate has the important side effect of
changing the global variable startup_progress_phase_start_time, which
is used by has_startup_progre
Hi,
I was looking using enable_timeout_every() in another place with Lukas
just now, and noticed the fin_time argument. It seems odd for an
interval firing interface to get an absolute timestamp as an
argument. The only in-tree user of enable_timeout_every() computes
fin_time explicitly using the
