> On 14 Jul 2025, at 00:15, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>
>>
>> Also, I'd prefer "page is not marked all-visible but visibility map bit is
>> set in relation" to emit XX001 for monitoring reasons, but again, this is
>> small note, while I need a broader picture.
>
> Could you clarify what you
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 2:34 PM Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
> > On 12 Jul 2025, at 03:19, Melanie Plageman
> > wrote:
> >
> > remove the xl_heap_visible struct
>
> Same goes for VISIBILITYMAP_XLOG_CATALOG_REL and XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE. But
> please do not rush to remove it, perhaps I will have a more
> On 12 Jul 2025, at 03:19, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>
> remove the xl_heap_visible struct
Same goes for VISIBILITYMAP_XLOG_CATALOG_REL and XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE. But please
do not rush to remove it, perhaps I will have a more exhaustive list later.
Currently the patch set is expected to be unp
