> On 19 Feb 2022, at 14:20, Zhihong Yu wrote:
> When i was looking at the code for ExecMergeJoin(), I noticed a few places
> where the join state name in the comment doesn't match the actual state.
Given the comments on the other states, I'm bound to agree. Unless there are
objections I'll go
Hi,
When i was looking at the code for ExecMergeJoin(), I noticed a few places
where the join state name in the comment doesn't match the actual state.
Here is a small patch with correction.
Cheers
merge-join-state-doc.patch
Description: Binary data
