On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:43:52AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> LGTM!
Thanks, committed.
--
nathan
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:28 PM Nathan Bossart
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:35:27AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Another option that I think would also work is to just cut down the
> details
> >> to just "The --jobs o
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:35:27AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Another option that I think would also work is to just cut down the details
>> to just "The --jobs option allows multiple CPU cores to be
>> used".
>
> That's fine
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Another option that I think would also work is to just cut down the details
> to just "The --jobs option allows multiple CPU cores to be
> used".
That's fine with me. It's probably not particularly actionable
information, anyway.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 11:00 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 4 Mar 2025, at 19:08, Nathan Bossart
> wrote:
>
> > The attached patch replaces the "et cetera" with those two general
> categories.
>
> LGTM.
>
Another option that I think would also work is to just cut down the details
to just "T
> On 4 Mar 2025, at 19:08, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The attached patch replaces the "et cetera" with those two general categories.
LGTM.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
c5a41c0b7a61433b1cd0e6315b9c4bbc536608 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 11:52:45 -0600
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] doc: Expand note about pg_upgrade's --jobs option.
Commit 40e2e5e92b and several follow-up commits parallelized many
pg_upgrade tasks but did no
