On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 11:00:54AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> I pushed that as commit 8e7e672 (2024-10-25). I now think DELAY_CHKPT_START
> is superfluous here, per this proc.h comment:
>
> * (In the
> * extremely common case where the data being modified is in shared buffers
> * and we acquir
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 06:29:08PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmi...@google.com wrote:
> > Separable, nontrivial things not fixed in the attached patch stack:
>
> > - Trouble is possible, I bet, if the system crashes between the
> > inplace-update
> > memcp
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:17:44PM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2024, at 06:29, Noah Misch wrote:
> > This resolves the last inplace update defect known to me.
>
> That’s a huge amount of work, thank you!
>
> Do I get it right, that inplace updates are catalog-specific and some ot
> On 20 Jun 2024, at 06:29, Noah Misch wrote:
>
> This resolves the last inplace update defect known to me.
That’s a huge amount of work, thank you!
Do I get it right, that inplace updates are catalog-specific and some other OOM
corruptions [0] and Standby corruptions [1] are not related to
https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmi...@google.com wrote:
> Separable, nontrivial things not fixed in the attached patch stack:
> - Trouble is possible, I bet, if the system crashes between the inplace-update
> memcpy() and XLogInsert(). See the new XXX comment below the memcpy().
That co
