On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 09:05:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks, done.
Thanks!
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:23:49PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Looks good to me.
Thanks, done.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 17.01.23 07:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:53:40AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
+1.
While I don't forget about this thread.. Any objections if I were to
apply that?
Looks good to me.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:53:40AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +1.
While I don't forget about this thread.. Any objections if I were to
apply that?
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 08:13:28AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 08:23:13AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2023-01-14 Sa 18:11, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> I've attached a patch for $SUBJECT, which allows us to remove a use of the
>>> unconstify macro in basic_archive. T
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 08:23:13AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2023-01-14 Sa 18:11, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> I've attached a patch for $SUBJECT, which allows us to remove a use of the
>> unconstify macro in basic_archive. This is just a pet peeve, but maybe it
>> bothers others, too.
>
> I
On 2023-01-14 Sa 18:11, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I've attached a patch for $SUBJECT, which allows us to remove a use of the
> unconstify macro in basic_archive. This is just a pet peeve, but maybe it
> bothers others, too.
I don't like using unconstify where it can be avoided, so this looks
rea
I've attached a patch for $SUBJECT, which allows us to remove a use of the
unconstify macro in basic_archive. This is just a pet peeve, but maybe it
bothers others, too.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
diff --git a/contrib/basic_archive/basic_archive.c b/contrib/bas