Tom, thanks for operational response reaction.
Based on this topic and some nearby ones
the problem turned out to be deeper than
expceted... as always.
p.s. Sorry for cyrillic in the mailing list.
At the beginning I wrote from corporate email
and could not change the sender name.
If you can, pleas
I wrote:
> There are various other minor issues, but they generally look
> fixable with little consequence.
I've now pushed your patch and additional minor fixes, and
we've expanded cpluspluscheck's coverage so we don't miss
such issues in future.
regards, tom lane
I wrote:
> I propose that we change src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck so that
> it searches basically everywhere:
> -for f in `find src/include src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-fe.h
> src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-events.h -name '*.h' -print | \
> +for f in `find src contrib -name '*.h' -print | \
Afte
[ redirecting to -hackers ]
=?koi8-r?B?9MHSwdPP1yDnxc/Sx8nKIPfJ1MHM2MXXyd4=?= writes:
> I'm working on development of some PL/pgSQL plugin.
> The smaller part of my code is written on C.
> It's a standard extension code for integration with fmgr (_PG_init ...)
> But bigger part of the code is wri
