On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:44 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 11:24:49AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Thanks for the rebase (and the reminder..). I'll look at that once
> > v13 opens for business.
>
> And applied.
Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 11:24:49AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks for the rebase (and the reminder..). I'll look at that once
> v13 opens for business.
And applied.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:25:00AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> The patch does not apply anymore, so here's a rebased version.
Thanks for the rebase (and the reminder..). I'll look at that once
v13 opens for business.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:09 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > I attach two patches to fix both (it could be squashed in a single
> > commit as both are straightforward), for upcoming v13.
>
> Squashing both patches together makes the
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I attach two patches to fix both (it could be squashed in a single
> commit as both are straightforward), for upcoming v13.
Squashing both patches together makes the most sense in my opinion as
the same areas are reworked. I can no
Hi,
As discussed in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caobau_yo61rwno3cw6wvywwh7eympuexhkqufb2nfgodunb...@mail.gmail.com,
current coding in reindexdb.c is error prone, and
reindex_system_catalogs() is also not really required.
I attach two patches to fix both (it could be squashed in a single
