On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:52 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
>
> By way of documentation, I've just now tried to answer these question
> in the new FAQ at:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Cfbot
Great! Thanks a lot!
Thomas Munro writes:
> By way of documentation, I've just now tried to answer these question
> in the new FAQ at:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Cfbot
Thanks!
regards, tom lane
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:37 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:19:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> 2. You are attaching some random files, and would like to not
> >> displace the cfbot's idea of the latest patchset.
>
> > I'm assuming that someone wanting
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:37 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> AFAIK, if you're submitting a patch then you have to attach a complete
> patchset, or the cfbot will be totally lost. Getting the bot to
> understand incremental patches would be useful for sure ... but it's
> outside the scope of what I'm askin
Julien Rouhaud writes:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:19:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 2. You are attaching some random files, and would like to not
>> displace the cfbot's idea of the latest patchset.
> I'm assuming that someone wanting to send an additional patch to be applied on
> top of the OP
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:19:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud writes:
> > For this kind of situation I think that the usual solution is to use a
> > .txt extension to make sure that the cfbot won't try to apply it.
>
> Yeah ... this has come up before. Is there a documented way to
>
Julien Rouhaud writes:
> For this kind of situation I think that the usual solution is to use a
> .txt extension to make sure that the cfbot won't try to apply it.
Yeah ... this has come up before. Is there a documented way to
attach files that the cfbot will ignore?
Two specific scenarios seem
