Re: biblio.sgml dead link

2022-01-05 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:56:26PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > I think we should remove the link, not because it costs money but because it > can be purchased from several places, and choosing one to "favor" seems to > invite criticism. Kind of how we don't link to an online store for buying

Re: biblio.sgml dead link

2022-01-05 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 5 Jan 2022, at 02:26, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:10:07PM +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> The replacement is a ~200 euro pdf (2021). I'd be thankful if someone would >> send the pdf to me; maybe I can update my JSON tests. >> >> And we should remove that entry from

Re: biblio.sgml dead link

2022-01-04 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:10:07PM +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote: > The replacement is a ~200 euro pdf (2021). I'd be thankful if someone would > send the pdf to me; maybe I can update my JSON tests. > > And we should remove that entry from the bibliography (or have it point to > the new page [1]).

biblio.sgml dead link

2022-01-04 Thread Erik Rijkers
On master, doc/src/sgml/biblio.sgml has a biblioentry for a pdf from ISO: "Information technology — Database languages — SQL Technical Reports — Part SQL Notation support 6: (JSON) for JavaScript Object" That pdf was a 2017 edition but the url now points to .zip that no longer exists. The re