On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:01 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/12/04 12:21, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:09 PM Fujii Masao
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2020/12/03 11:46, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:11 PM Masahiko Sawada
On 2020/12/04 12:21, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:09 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/12/03 11:46, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:11 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:33 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahi
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:09 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/12/03 11:46, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:11 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:33 PM Fujii Masao
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahiko Saw
On 2020/12/03 11:46, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:11 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:33 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:31 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fuj
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:11 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:33 PM Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:31 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fujii Masao
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:33 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:31 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fujii Masao
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2020/12/01 16:23, Masahiko Sawada wrot
Hi
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:33 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:31 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fujii Masao
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2020/12/01 16:23, Masahiko Sawada
On 2020/12/02 12:53, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:31 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/12/01 16:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:59
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:31 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/12/01 16:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:32 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/12/01 16:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:59 PM Fujii Masao
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2020/11/30 10:43, Mas
On 2020/12/01 16:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:59 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/30 10:43, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:34 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi, Thanks for you com
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:59 PM Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/11/30 10:43, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:34 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi, Thanks for you comments.
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:59 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/11/30 10:43, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:34 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Thanks for you comments.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:51 PM Fujii Masao
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >
On 2020/11/30 10:43, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:34 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi, Thanks for you comments.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:51 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/27 18:38, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao wrot
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:34 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
>
> Hi, Thanks for you comments.
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:51 PM Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/11/27 18:38, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao
> > > wrote:
> >
Hi, Thanks for you comments.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:51 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/11/27 18:38, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2020/11/26 10:41, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25,
On 2020/11/27 18:38, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/11/26 10:41, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:46 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:22 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2020/11/26 10:41, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:46 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasaha
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/11/26 10:41, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:46 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:43 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/11/26 10:41, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:46 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2
On 2020/11/26 10:41, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:46 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:17 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:50 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:46 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:17 PM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:50 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:17 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:50 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:17 PM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:50 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > wrote:
> > > > I wonder if we could have table_recheck_autovac do two probes of the
> > > > stats
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:50 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> wrote:
> > > I wonder if we could have table_recheck_autovac do two probes of the stats
> > > data. First probe the existing stats data, and if it shows the table to
> > > be
Therefore, we expect this patch [1] to be committed for its original
purpose, as well as to improve autovacuum from v14 onwards.Hi,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:50 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> wrote:
> > > I wonder if we could have tabl
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Kasahara Tatsuhito
wrote:
> > I wonder if we could have table_recheck_autovac do two probes of the stats
> > data. First probe the existing stats data, and if it shows the table to
> > be already vacuumed, return immediately. If not, *then* force a stats
> > r
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:46 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> So I think Kasahara-san's point is that the shared memory stats collector
> might wipe out those costs, depending on how it's implemented. (I've not
> looked at that patch in a long time either, so I don't know how much it'd
> cut the reader-
Jim Nasby writes:
> Without reading the 100+ emails or the 260k patch, I'm guessing that it
> won't help because the problem I observed was spending most of it's time in
> 42.62% postgres [.] hash_search_with_hash_value
> I don't see how moving things to shared memory would help that
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:49 AM Jim Nasby wrote:
> I'm in favor of trying to improve scheduling (especially allowing users
> to control how things are scheduled), but that's a far more invasive
> patch. I'd like to get something like this patch in without waiting on a
> significantly larger e
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 06:43, Nasby, Jim wrote:
>
> A database with a very large number of tables eligible for autovacuum can
> result in autovacuum workers “stuck” in a tight loop of
> table_recheck_autovac() constantly reporting nothing to do on the table. This
> is because a database with a
31 matches
Mail list logo