On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 2:55 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:20 AM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Will push the patch tomorrow.
>
> Done. (I didn't have time for this, because I was terribly busy with
> other stuff.)
I mean I didn't have time for this *yesterday*.
Best regards,
Et
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:20 AM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Will push the patch tomorrow.
Done. (I didn't have time for this, because I was terribly busy with
other stuff.)
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Amit-san,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:13 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your time on fixing these multi-column range
> partition pruning issues. I'm sorry that I failed to notice the
> previous two reports on -bugs for which you committed a fix last week.
No problem.
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2
Fujita-san,
Thanks a lot for your time on fixing these multi-column range
partition pruning issues. I'm sorry that I failed to notice the
previous two reports on -bugs for which you committed a fix last week.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:46 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Commit 13838740f fixed some issu
Commit 13838740f fixed some issues with step generation in partition
pruning, but as I mentioned in [1], I noticed that there is yet
another issue: get_steps_using_prefix() assumes that clauses in the
passed-in prefix list are sorted in ascending order of their partition
key numbers, but the caller
