Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I'm planning to close this patch until someone can shepherd it.
I've marked it RwF for now.
--Jacob
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 08:59:31PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Rebased on 8e1fae193864527c931a704bd7908e4fbc983f5c.
>
> Would someone step up to "own" this patch ?
>
> If not, its CF entry may need to be closed (there's no status for "needs
> author").
I'm planning to close this patch until so
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:38:56PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 07:26:42PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:22:01AM +0300, Anna Akenteva wrote:
> > > On 2019-11-29 05:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > > These comments are unanswered for more than 2
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 07:26:42PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:22:01AM +0300, Anna Akenteva wrote:
> > On 2019-11-29 05:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > These comments are unanswered for more than 2 months, so I am marking
> > > this entry as returned with feedback.
> >
> On 30 Aug 2021, at 02:26, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Rebased on f10f0ae420ee62400876ab34dca2c09c20dcd030.
This patch no longer applies, please submit a rebased version.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:22:01AM +0300, Anna Akenteva wrote:
> On 2019-11-29 05:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > These comments are unanswered for more than 2 months, so I am marking
> > this entry as returned with feedback.
>
> I'd like to revive this patch. To make further work easier, attaching
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:52 PM Anna Akenteva wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-29 05:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > These comments are unanswered for more than 2 months, so I am marking
> > this entry as returned with feedback.
>
> I'd like to revive this patch. To make further work easier, attaching a
> reb
On 2019-11-29 05:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
These comments are unanswered for more than 2 months, so I am marking
this entry as returned with feedback.
I'd like to revive this patch. To make further work easier, attaching a
rebased version of the latest patch by Alexander.
As for having yet
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 01:05:06PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't think we should have yet another copy of logic determining
> visibility. It has repeatedly proven hard to get right in the past, and
> it'll not get better by having yet another copy. Especially not because
> we've basically
Hi,
On 2019-09-13 22:22:50 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:55 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:30 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:37 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > > wrote:
> > > > I found it weird that CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:55 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:30 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:37 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > > I found it weird that CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL don't write visibility map.
> > > Attached patch implements writing visi
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:30 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:37 PM Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
> > I found it weird that CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL don't write visibility map.
> > Attached patch implements writing visibility map in
> > heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster().
> >
> > I've st
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:37 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I found it weird that CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL don't write visibility map.
> Attached patch implements writing visibility map in
> heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster().
>
> I've studied previous attempt to implement this [1]. The main
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> This patch have to implement its own check if tuple is allvisible.
> But it appears to be possible to simplify this check assuming that all
> tuples already past HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum(), which sets hint bits.
Forgot to check tuple xmi
Hi!
I found it weird that CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL don't write visibility map.
Attached patch implements writing visibility map in
heapam_relation_copy_for_cluster().
I've studied previous attempt to implement this [1]. The main problem
of that attempt was usage of existing heap_page_is_all_visible()
15 matches
Mail list logo