Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Hello hackers, 11.11.2020 04:04, Michael Paquier wrote: > And this configuration matches exactly what you have with the host > where the test passed. > > Now I do see a difference in the Windows 10 build involved, 10.0.19041 > fails but 10.0.18363 passes. I find rather hard to buy that this is > d

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Russell Foster wrote: > Never claimed they were the same, but they are both Windows x64. Here > are some more details: > > Test Passes: > VM machine (Build Server) > Microsoft Windows 10 Pro > Version 10.0.18363 Build 18363 > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:52 PM Tomas Vondra wrote: > > > > > On 11/10/20 7:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Tomas Vondra writes: > >> That's unlikely, I think. The regression tests are constructed so that > >> the estimates are stable. It's more likely this is some difference in > >> rounding behavior

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Em ter., 10 de nov. de 2020 às 14:16, Russell Foster < russell.foster.cod...@gmail.com> escreveu: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:03 PM Ranier Vilela > wrote: > > > > Em sex., 26 de jun. de 2020 às 08:21, Ranier Vilela > escreveu: > >> > >> Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:28, Ranier Vilela < > ra

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:15 PM Tom Lane wrote: > > Tomas Vondra writes: > > That's unlikely, I think. The regression tests are constructed so that > > the estimates are stable. It's more likely this is some difference in > > rounding behavior, for example. > > The reported delta is in the actual

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On 11/10/20 7:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra writes: >> That's unlikely, I think. The regression tests are constructed so that >> the estimates are stable. It's more likely this is some difference in >> rounding behavior, for example. > > The reported delta is in the actual row count,

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Tomas Vondra writes: > That's unlikely, I think. The regression tests are constructed so that > the estimates are stable. It's more likely this is some difference in > rounding behavior, for example. The reported delta is in the actual row count, not an estimate. How could that be subject to roun

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On 11/10/20 6:16 PM, Russell Foster wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:03 PM Ranier Vilela wrote: >> >> Em sex., 26 de jun. de 2020 às 08:21, Ranier Vilela >> escreveu: >>> >>> Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:28, Ranier Vilela >>> escreveu: Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01,

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 12:03 PM Ranier Vilela wrote: > > Em sex., 26 de jun. de 2020 às 08:21, Ranier Vilela > escreveu: >> >> Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:28, Ranier Vilela >> escreveu: >>> >>> Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan >>> escreveu: On 6/11/2

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Em sex., 26 de jun. de 2020 às 08:21, Ranier Vilela escreveu: > Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:28, Ranier Vilela > escreveu: > >> Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan < >> andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: >> >>> >>> On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: >>> > Hi, >

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:28, Ranier Vilela escreveu: > Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan < > andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: > >> >> On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: >> > Hi, >> > Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests. >> > >> > float8

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

> "Ranier" == Ranier Vilela writes: Ranier> Hi, Ranier> Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests. Ranier> three | f1 |sqrt_f1 Ranier> ---+--+--- Ranier> | 1004.3 | 31.6906926

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 11:00, Andrew Dunstan < andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: > > On 6/11/20 9:40 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:36, Andrew Dunstan > > > > escreveu: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On 6/11/20 9:40 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:36, Andrew Dunstan > > escreveu: > > > > > > > > >       * which configuration settings you're using > > > > None. Only build with default configuration (release is

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:36, Andrew Dunstan < andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: > > On 6/11/20 9:28 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan > > > > escreveu: > > > > > > On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranie

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On 6/11/20 9:28 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan > > escreveu: > > > On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > Hi, > > Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests. > > > >  float8      

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan < andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu: > > On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > Hi, > > Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests. > > > > float8 ... FAILED 517 ms > > partition_prune ..

Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote: > Hi, > Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests. > >  float8                       ... FAILED      517 ms >  partition_prune              ... FAILED     3085 ms > > Ranier, The first thing you should do when you find this is to see if there is a b

Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)

Hi, Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests. float8 ... FAILED 517 ms partition_prune ... FAILED 3085 ms regards, Ranier VIlela regression.diffs Description: Binary data regression.out Description: Binary data