https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABRT9RA-RomVS-yzQ2wUtZ=m-ev61lcbrl1p1j3jydpsttf...@mail.gmail.com
- WIP Patch: Precalculate stable functions (Marina, 2017),
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ba261b9fc25dea4069d8ba9a8fcad...@postgrespro.ru
- WIP Patch: Precalculate stable func
On 2018-11-29 18:00:15 +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:22 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:00:33PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> > > Here there's a 9-th version of the patches for the precalculation of
> > > stable
> > > or immutable functio
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:22 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:00:33PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> > Here there's a 9-th version of the patches for the precalculation of stable
> > or immutable functions, stable or immutable operators and other nonvolatile
> > expressi
Hi Marina,
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:00:33PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> Here there's a 9-th version of the patches for the precalculation of stable
> or immutable functions, stable or immutable operators and other nonvolatile
> expressions. This is a try to execute cached expressions as PAR
On 3/3/18 2:42 AM, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> Ok!
>
> On 02-03-2018 22:56, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018-03-02 11:22:01 +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
>>> I fixed the failure that Thomas pointed out to me, and I'm finishing
>>> work on
>>> it, but it took me a while to study this part o
Ok!
On 02-03-2018 22:56, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2018-03-02 11:22:01 +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
I fixed the failure that Thomas pointed out to me, and I'm finishing
work on
it, but it took me a while to study this part of the executor..
I unfortunately think that makes this too late
Hi,
On 2018-03-02 11:22:01 +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> I fixed the failure that Thomas pointed out to me, and I'm finishing work on
> it, but it took me a while to study this part of the executor..
I unfortunately think that makes this too late for v11, and we should
mark this as returned wi
Hello!
I fixed the failure that Thomas pointed out to me, and I'm finishing
work on it, but it took me a while to study this part of the executor..
On 02-03-2018 0:11, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2018-02-01 08:01:48 +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> ISTM, there might be some value to conside
Hi,
On 2018-02-01 08:01:48 +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> > ISTM, there might be some value to consider all of them in the design of
> > the new mechanism.
>
> I'm sorry, the other parts have occupied all the time, and I'll work on it..
That has, as far as I can see, not happened. And the patch
Hello!
Thank you for reporting! I'll try to get it on our buildfarm..
On 05-02-2018 0:10, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Marina Polyakova
wrote:
This is the 8-th version of the patch for the precalculation of stable
or
immutable functions, stable or immutable operators an
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Marina Polyakova
wrote:
> This is the 8-th version of the patch for the precalculation of stable or
> immutable functions, stable or immutable operators and other nonvolatile
> expressions. This is a try to fix the most problems (I'm sorry, it took some
> time..) th
Hello!
On 24-01-2018 23:36, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2018-01-24 15:10:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
...
Keeping the stored value of a CachedExpr in a Param slot is an
interesting idea indeed.
We keep coming back to this, IIRC we had a pretty similar discussion
around redesigning caseValue_datum/is
On 2018-01-24 15:10:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2018-01-16 17:05:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm curious to know whether Andres has some other ideas, or whether he
> >> feels this is all a big wart on the compiled-expression concept.
>
> > I don't have too many "art
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2018-01-16 17:05:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm curious to know whether Andres has some other ideas, or whether he
>> feels this is all a big wart on the compiled-expression concept.
> I don't have too many "artistic" concerns from the compiled expression
> POV. The b
Hi,
On 2018-01-16 17:05:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ I'm sending this comment separately because I think it's an issue
> Andres might take an interest in. ]
Thanks for that. I indeed am interested. Sorry for the late response,
was very deep into the JIT patch.
> Marina Polyakova writes:
> >
On 17-01-2018 1:05, Tom Lane wrote:
[ I'm sending this comment separately because I think it's an issue
Andres might take an interest in. ]
Marina Polyakova writes:
[ v7-0001-Precalculate-stable-and-immutable-functions.patch ]
Another thing that's bothering me is that the execution semantics
As I said, thank you so much for your comments!!
On 17-01-2018 0:30, Tom Lane wrote:
...
This is indeed quite a large patch, but it seems to me it could become
smaller. After a bit of review:
1. I do not like what you've done with ParamListInfo. The changes
around
that are invasive, accountin
Thank you so much for your comments!! I'll answer a bit later because
now I'm trying to find a test for int128 on Solaris 10.. [1]
On 17-01-2018 1:05, Tom Lane wrote:
[ I'm sending this comment separately because I think it's an issue
Andres might take an interest in. ]
Marina Polyakova write
[ I'm sending this comment separately because I think it's an issue
Andres might take an interest in. ]
Marina Polyakova writes:
> [ v7-0001-Precalculate-stable-and-immutable-functions.patch ]
Another thing that's bothering me is that the execution semantics
you're proposing for CachedExpr seem
Aleksander Alekseev writes:
> I can confirm this code works. However, since this is quite a large patch, I
> believe we better have a second reviewer or a very attentive committer.
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
This is indeed quite a large patch, but it seems to me it c
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed
I can confirm this code works. However, since this is quite a
Thanks for your patch, looks quite interesting!
Glad to hear it :)
To not send big patch I have split it (that's why version starts
with the
first again) and here I send infrastructure patch which includes:
Yeah, but it's still 18k lines :)
Here 13k lines - 2 sets of expected results for
> On 31 December 2017 at 06:55, Marina Polyakova
wrote:
>
> Secondly, here there's a sixth version of the patch for the
precalculation of
> stable or immutable functions, stable or immutable operators and other
> nonvolatile expressions.
Thanks for your patch, looks quite interesting!
> To not s
23 matches
Mail list logo
