On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:04 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > > "full page records" seems to be showing the number of full page
> > > > images, not the record having full page images.
> > >
> > > I am not sure what exactly is a diffe
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > "full page records" seems to be showing the number of full page
> > > images, not the record having full page images.
> >
> > I am not sure what exactly is a difference but it is the records
> > having full page images. Julien c
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:58 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:57 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, A
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:57 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby
>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
> > >
> > > 1) records; 2) pages ("full pag
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
> >
> > 1) records; 2) pages ("full page images"); 3) bytes
> >
> > That is exactly like sort (method/type/
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> > > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
>
> 1) records; 2) pages ("full page images"); 3) bytes
>
> That is exactly like sort (method/type/size) and hash (buckets/batches/size),
> and *not* like buffers, which show
> > > > > Regarding
> > > > > v10-0004-Add-option-to-report-WAL-usage-in-EXPLAIN-and-au.patch:
> > > > > I think there should be additional spaces before "full" and before
> > > > > "bytes":
> > > > >
> > > > > >WAL: records=2359 full page records=42 bytes=447788
> > > > >
> > > > > Compare w
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:05 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:32:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > > wrote in
> > > > Regarding
> > > > v10-0004
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:32:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> >
> > At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > wrote in
> > > Regarding v10-0004-Add-option-to-report-WAL-usage-in-EXPLAIN-and-au.patch:
> > > I think there sh
Thanks all for the feedback.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:02 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> >
> > At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby
> > wrote in
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > In thre
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
> in
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
> > > statement in a way quite simila
At Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:41:20 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
in
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
> > statement in a way quite similar to how we expose BufferUsage data.
> > The way it exposes seems rea
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
> statement in a way quite similar to how we expose BufferUsage data.
> The way it exposes seems reasonable to me and no one else raises any
> objection. It could be th
Hi,
In thread [1], we are discussing to expose WAL usage data for each
statement in a way quite similar to how we expose BufferUsage data.
The way it exposes seems reasonable to me and no one else raises any
objection. It could be that it appears fine to others who have
reviewed the patch but I t
16 matches
Mail list logo