On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:50 PM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 19.12.23 07:23, Richard Guo wrote:
> > By chance I discovered that the comment for the typedefs of "double"s
> > does not cover Cardinality. Should we update that comment accordingly,
> > maybe something like below?
> >
> > - * Typede
On 19.12.23 07:23, Richard Guo wrote:
By chance I discovered that the comment for the typedefs of "double"s
does not cover Cardinality. Should we update that comment accordingly,
maybe something like below?
- * Typedefs for identifying qualifier selectivities and plan costs as such.
- * These a
By chance I discovered that the comment for the typedefs of "double"s
does not cover Cardinality. Should we update that comment accordingly,
maybe something like below?
- * Typedefs for identifying qualifier selectivities and plan costs as such.
- * These are just plain "double"s, but declaring a
