On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:24 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >>> The attached patch updates the code comment which is no longer true
> >>> after commit # 4a92a1c3d1c361ffb031ed05bf65b801241d7cdd
> >> Agreed, but looking at this shouldn't we also tweak the comment on
> >> RecoveryInProgress() as per t
> On 1 Dec 2021, at 07:19, Amul Sul wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:09 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Nov 2021, at 08:00, Amul Sul wrote:
>>
>>> The attached patch updates the code comment which is no longer true
>>> after commit # 4a92a1c3d1c361ffb031ed05bf65b801241d7cdd
>>
>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:09 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > On 30 Nov 2021, at 08:00, Amul Sul wrote:
>
> > The attached patch updates the code comment which is no longer true
> > after commit # 4a92a1c3d1c361ffb031ed05bf65b801241d7cdd
>
> Agreed, but looking at this shouldn't we also tweak th
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 08:00, Amul Sul wrote:
> The attached patch updates the code comment which is no longer true
> after commit # 4a92a1c3d1c361ffb031ed05bf65b801241d7cdd
Agreed, but looking at this shouldn't we also tweak the comment on
RecoveryInProgress() as per the attached v2 diff?
--
Dan
Hi,
The attached patch updates the code comment which is no longer true
after commit # 4a92a1c3d1c361ffb031ed05bf65b801241d7cdd
--
Regards,
Amul Sul
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/checkpointer.c b/src/backend/postmaster/checkpointer.c
index be7366379d0..25a18
