Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 06:54:32AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> How do you know that they are not used by anyone in the wild?
>> If they are broken, it would be a clue. If not, possibly someone somewhere
>> could be using it, eg for debug (what does this result look lik
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 06:54:32AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> How do you know that they are not used by anyone in the wild?
> If they are broken, it would be a clue. If not, possibly someone somewhere
> could be using it, eg for debug (what does this result look like?).
They have been around fo
Bonjour Michaël,
I have noticed today that the two functions in $subject are part of
libpq and remain around undocumented since they are around (see
6ef5846 and 2b84cbb). Isn't it past time to get rid of them? We have
PQprint as well, which was used in the past by psql but not today,
still th
Hi all,
I have noticed today that the two functions in $subject are part of
libpq and remain around undocumented since they are around (see
6ef5846 and 2b84cbb). Isn't it past time to get rid of them? We have
PQprint as well, which was used in the past by psql but not today,
still that's documen
