> Hm. There was never really any expectation that support functions
> would be attached to PL functions --- since you have to write the
> former in C, it seems a little odd for the supported function not
> to also be C. Perhaps more to the point though, what simplification
> knowledge is this sup
Ronan Dunklau writes:
> What I want to do is to evaluate whether id = t1_id AND somecolumn is NOT
> NULL at planification time, and replace the function by another one if this
> can be pruned altogether.
Hm. There was never really any expectation that support functions
would be attached to PL fu
Hello,
I've been trying to play with support functions for a use-case of ours, and
found some behaviors I don't know are expected or not.
The use case: we have some complicated queries, where whole-branches of the
execution tree could be cut if some things were evaluated at planning time.
Take th
