Hi Michael,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 11:21 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:47:20AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > Thanks for your review.
>
> The SPLIT/MERGE grammar has been reverted in 3890d90c1508, so this
> patch concept does not apply anymore.
> --
> Michael
Yeah, I c
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:47:20AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> Thanks for your review.
The SPLIT/MERGE grammar has been reverted in 3890d90c1508, so this
patch concept does not apply anymore.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Fujii,
Thanks for your review.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 9:54 PM Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024/08/06 19:28, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > Attached v2 addressed all the problems you mentioned, thanks.
>
> Thanks for updating the patches!
>
>
> In the ALTER TABLE documentation, v1 patch updated the
On 2024/08/06 19:28, Junwang Zhao wrote:
Attached v2 addressed all the problems you mentioned, thanks.
Thanks for updating the patches!
In the ALTER TABLE documentation, v1 patch updated the syntax, but the
descriptions for MERGE and SPLIT should also be updated to explain the
tablespace
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:34 PM Amul Sul wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:05 PM Junwang Zhao wrote:
> >
> > Hi Amul,
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:38 PM Amul Sul wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:19 AM Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > > >
> > >[...]
> > >
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:05 PM Junwang Zhao wrote:
>
> Hi Amul,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:38 PM Amul Sul wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:19 AM Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > >
> >[...]
> > static Relation
> > -createPartitionTable(RangeVar *newPartName, Relatio
Hi Amul,
Thanks for your review.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 8:38 PM Amul Sul wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:19 AM Junwang Zhao wrote:
> >
> > In [1], it is suggested that it might be a good idea to support
> > specifying the tablespace for each merged/split partition.
> >
> > We can do the f
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:19 AM Junwang Zhao wrote:
>
> In [1], it is suggested that it might be a good idea to support
> specifying the tablespace for each merged/split partition.
>
> We can do the following after this feature is supported:
>
> CREATE TABLESPACE tblspc LOCATION '/tmp/tblspc';
>
In [1], it is suggested that it might be a good idea to support
specifying the tablespace for each merged/split partition.
We can do the following after this feature is supported:
CREATE TABLESPACE tblspc LOCATION '/tmp/tblspc';
CREATE TABLE t (i int PRIMARY KEY) PARTITION BY RANGE (i);
CREATE TA
