At Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:39:42 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote
in
> > On 29 Aug 2023, at 13:11, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-Aug-29, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >
> >> Agreed. While we have numerous "power of 2" these were the only ones
> >> in translated user-facing messages, so I've p
> On 29 Aug 2023, at 13:11, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2023-Aug-29, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> Agreed. While we have numerous "power of 2" these were the only ones
>> in translated user-facing messages, so I've pushed this to master (it
>> didn't seem worth disrupting translations for 16 a
On 2023-Aug-29, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Agreed. While we have numerous "power of 2" these were the only ones
> in translated user-facing messages, so I've pushed this to master (it
> didn't seem worth disrupting translations for 16 as we are so close to
> wrapping it, if others disagree I can
> On 29 Aug 2023, at 10:56, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> pg_resetwal and initdb has an error message like this:
>
> msgid "argument of --wal-segsize must be a power of 2 between 1 and 1024"
>
> In other parts in the tree, however, we spell it as "power of two". I
> think it would make sense to st
Hello.
pg_resetwal and initdb has an error message like this:
msgid "argument of --wal-segsize must be a power of 2 between 1 and 1024"
In other parts in the tree, however, we spell it as "power of two". I
think it would make sense to standardize the spelling for
consistency. See the attached.
