On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 01:03:44PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Thank you for finding and fixing this.
>
> At Sat, 15 Sep 2018 18:21:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote in
> <1.1537050...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> > Noah Misch writes:
> > > Usually, the first srandom() call happens early in PostmasterMain
Thank you for finding and fixing this.
At Sat, 15 Sep 2018 18:21:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote in
<1.1537050...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Noah Misch writes:
> > Usually, the first srandom() call happens early in PostmasterMain(). I plan
> > to add one to InitStandaloneProcess(), which substitutes for se
Noah Misch writes:
> Usually, the first srandom() call happens early in PostmasterMain(). I plan
> to add one to InitStandaloneProcess(), which substitutes for several tasks
> otherwise done in PostmasterMain(). That seems like a good thing even if DSM
> weren't in the picture. Also, initdb nee
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:07:43AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2013-10-30 08:45:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> If I'm reading this correctly, the last three runs on frogmouth have
> >> all failed, and all of them have failed with a co
