At Wed, 7 Mar 2018 07:10:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera
wrote in <20180307101034.l7z7kqwqfkjg6c2p@alvherre.pgsql>
> Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>
> > 1. some messages are missing partitioned table/index
..
> I *think* the idea here is that a partitioned table is a table, so there
> is no need to say "foo
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> 1. some messages are missing partitioned table/index
>
> The first attached. I'm not sure how the orering ought to be
> but I arranged them in mainly in the appearance order in if()
> conditions, or the order of case label in switch()
> construct. One exception
Hello.
While translating message catalogs, I found that some messages
listing object names are missing partitioned tables/indices.
And GUC comment for autovacuum_work_mem has a typo.
1. some messages are missing partitioned table/index
The first attached. I'm not sure how the orering ought to
