On 09/10/2018 22:25, David Rowley wrote:
> On 10 October 2018 at 02:38, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>> - * subplan_map[] and subpart_map[] are indexed by partition index (where
>> - * zero is the topmost partition, and non-leaf partitions must come before
>> - * their children). For a leaf partitio
On 10 October 2018 at 02:38, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> - * subplan_map[] and subpart_map[] are indexed by partition index (where
> - * zero is the topmost partition, and non-leaf partitions must come before
> - * their children). For a leaf partition p, subplan_map[p] contains the
> + * subplan_m
On 27/09/2018 23:20, David Rowley wrote:
> I've noticed that the comments above the PartitionedRelPruneInfo
> struct incorrectly document how subplan_map and subpart_map are
> indexed. This seems to have snuck in on 4e232364033.
- * subplan_map[] and subpart_map[] are indexed by partition index (w
On 28 September 2018 at 09:20, David Rowley
wrote:
> I've noticed that the comments above the PartitionedRelPruneInfo
> struct incorrectly document how subplan_map and subpart_map are
> indexed. This seems to have snuck in on 4e232364033.
>
> Also, while reading the executor README file, I noticed
I've noticed that the comments above the PartitionedRelPruneInfo
struct incorrectly document how subplan_map and subpart_map are
indexed. This seems to have snuck in on 4e232364033.
Also, while reading the executor README file, I noticed that we
mentioned that executor nodes are created one for on