Em seg., 17 de mar. de 2025 às 16:17, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
> Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:14, Ranier Vilela
> escreveu:
>
>>
>>
>> Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:01, Álvaro Herrera <
>> alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
>>
>>> On 2025-Mar-07, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>> > Anyway, my
On 2025-Mar-18, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Thanks Álvaro, for the commit.
Thank you for the impetus.
--
Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Em seg., 17 de mar. de 2025 às 16:17, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
> Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:14, Ranier Vilela
> escreveu:
>
>>
>>
>> Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:01, Álvaro Herrera <
>> alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
>>
>>> On 2025-Mar-07, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>> > Anyway, my
Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:14, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
>
>
> Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:01, Álvaro Herrera <
> alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
>
>> On 2025-Mar-07, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> > Anyway, my version of this is attached. It fixes the problems with your
>> > patch, but
Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 16:01, Álvaro Herrera
escreveu:
> On 2025-Mar-07, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Anyway, my version of this is attached. It fixes the problems with your
> > patch, but not Orlov's fundamental bug.
>
> And of course I forgot to actually attach the patch. Good grief.
>
Hello
I find that this is still quite broken -- both the original, and your
patch. I have already complained about a fundamental bug in the
original in [1]. In addition to what I reported there, in the unpatched
code I noticed that we're wasting memory and CPU by comparing the
qualified table na
Em sex., 7 de mar. de 2025 às 15:54, Álvaro Herrera
escreveu:
> Hello
>
> I find that this is still quite broken -- both the original, and your
> patch. I have already complained about a fundamental bug in the
> original in [1]. In addition to what I reported there, in the unpatched
> code I no
On 2025-Mar-07, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Anyway, my version of this is attached. It fixes the problems with your
> patch, but not Orlov's fundamental bug.
And of course I forgot to actually attach the patch. Good grief.
--
Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseD
Em qui., 6 de mar. de 2025 às 15:51, Álvaro Herrera
escreveu:
> On 2025-Feb-28, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> > v2 attached, please comment if you have any further objections.
>
> I think running the tests would have been a good idea, as would checking
> for compiler warnings.
>
Hi.
Rebased for curren
On 2025-Feb-28, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> v2 attached, please comment if you have any further objections.
I think running the tests would have been a good idea, as would checking
for compiler warnings.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I love the Pos
Hi Álvaro.
Em qui., 27 de fev. de 2025 às 16:50, Álvaro Herrera <
alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
> On 2025-Feb-14, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> > Attached is the prototype version v1.
> > What do you think?
>
> I think this is still a bit confused. The new function's comment says
> "prepare the
On 2025-Feb-14, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Attached is the prototype version v1.
> What do you think?
I think this is still a bit confused. The new function's comment says
"prepare the list of tables to ..." but what it really receives is a
list of _indexes_ (as evidenced by the fact that they're co
On 2025-Feb-21, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Any chance to push this forward?
> Is it worth creating a committfest entry?
Yeah, I'll have a look.
--
Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Entristecido, Wutra (canción de Las Barreras)
echa a
Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 às 10:19, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
> Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 às 09:13, Ranier Vilela
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Álvaro.
>>
>> Em qui., 13 de fev. de 2025 às 18:38, Álvaro Herrera <
>> alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
>>
>>> On 2025-Feb-13, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>>>
>>> >
Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 às 09:13, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
> Hi Álvaro.
>
> Em qui., 13 de fev. de 2025 às 18:38, Álvaro Herrera <
> alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
>
>> On 2025-Feb-13, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>>
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > Coverity complained about possible dereference null pointer
>>
Hi Álvaro.
Em qui., 13 de fev. de 2025 às 18:38, Álvaro Herrera <
alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu:
> On 2025-Feb-13, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Coverity complained about possible dereference null pointer
> > in *reindex_one_database* function.
> > That's not really true.
> > But the
On 2025-Feb-13, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Coverity complained about possible dereference null pointer
> in *reindex_one_database* function.
> That's not really true.
> But the logic is unnecessarily complicated.
Hmm, this code looks quite suspect, but I wonder if instead of (what
looks more
Hi.
Coverity complained about possible dereference null pointer
in *reindex_one_database* function.
That's not really true.
But the logic is unnecessarily complicated.
Let's simplify it to humans and machines.
patch attached.
Best regards,
Ranier Vilela
simplifies-reindex-one-database-reindex
18 matches
Mail list logo