Re: Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config

2020-02-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-12-22 14:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote: There is also the weird difference with how the MSVC build system handles it. It appends VAL_CONFIGURE to pg_config.h instead of passing it on the command line. Here is an updated version of the patch after the removal of pg_config.h.win32. It's ea

Re: Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config

2019-12-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
ep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 14:50:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config The previous system had configure put the value into the makefiles and then have the makefiles pass them to the build of pg_config. That was put

Re: Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config

2019-12-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2019-12-03 06:03, Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut writes: Currently, configure puts the configure args into the makefiles and then have the makefiles pass them to the build of pg_config. That looks like an unnecessary redirection, and indeed that method was put in place when pg_config was

Re: Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config

2019-12-02 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > Currently, configure puts the configure args into the makefiles and > then have the makefiles pass them to the build of pg_config. That looks > like an unnecessary redirection, and indeed that method was > put in place when pg_config was a shell script. We can simplif

Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config

2019-12-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
From 8edb9c20cbee740b5d2acb3c68f0a3f8231fb3dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:16:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Simplify passing of configure arguments to pg_config The previous system had configure put the value into the makefiles and then have the makefiles pass them to the build of pg_co