On 07.10.22 18:43, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:10 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
The only drawback in terms of code robustness is that someone adding a
new shared object type would have to remember to add it to
EventTriggerSupportsObjectType().
This doesn't seem like a good idea t
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:10 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> The only drawback in terms of code robustness is that someone adding a
> new shared object type would have to remember to add it to
> EventTriggerSupportsObjectType().
This doesn't seem like a good idea to me. If the function names give
the
y go around and grep for,
say, OBJECT_TABLESPACE and find relevant places to update that way.
Thoughts?
From 9e6a4f5630378fe20c506de5b23bd9e900e2e7c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 13:34:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Simplify event trigger support checking fu
