On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 at 23:42, John Naylor wrote:
> The difference is small enough that normally I'd say it's likely
> unrelated to the patch, but on the other hand it's consistent with
> saving (3 * 10 * 10 million) cycles because of 1 less multiplication
> each, which is not nothing, but for shov
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 3:14 AM David Rowley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 09:02, David Fetter wrote:
> > This testing was basically just sending a bunch of appropriately sized
> > pseudo-random uints in a previously created array sent through a tight
> > loop that called the ilog10s and gett
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 09:02, David Fetter wrote:
> This testing was basically just sending a bunch of appropriately sized
> pseudo-random uints in a previously created array sent through a tight
> loop that called the ilog10s and getting average execution times.
>
> Any suggestions for more thoro
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 09:54:20PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 30/10/2024 21:27, David Fetter wrote:
> > Please find attached a patch to $Subject
> >
> > I've done some preliminary testing, and it appears to shave somewhere
> > between 25-50% off the operations themselves, and these casc
On 30/10/2024 21:27, David Fetter wrote:
Please find attached a patch to $Subject
I've done some preliminary testing, and it appears to shave somewhere
between 25-50% off the operations themselves, and these cascade into
things like formatting result sets and COPY OUT.
Impressive! What did you
Please find attached a patch to $Subject
I've done some preliminary testing, and it appears to shave somewhere
between 25-50% off the operations themselves, and these cascade into
things like formatting result sets and COPY OUT.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235
