Re: SQL JSON compliance

2022-04-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2022-04-29 Fr 04:13, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 13.04.22 22:43, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Simon has just pointed out to me that as a result of recent commits, a >> number of things now should move from the unsupported table to the >> supported table in features.sgml. In particular, it looks t

Re: SQL JSON compliance

2022-04-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 13.04.22 22:43, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Simon has just pointed out to me that as a result of recent commits, a number of things now should move from the unsupported table to the supported table in features.sgml. In particular, it looks to me like all of these should move: This all looks correc

SQL JSON compliance

2022-04-13 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Simon has just pointed out to me that as a result of recent commits, a number of things now should move from the unsupported table to the supported table in features.sgml. In particular, it looks to me like all of these should move: T811           Basic SQL/JSON constructor functions       T812