I filed a commitfest entry for this so that it doesn't get lost:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/4093
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:59:48PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I can't think of any reason for this behavior, and I didn't find an
> obvious answer in the last commits to touch that (2ad36c4e44,
> fa2642438f).
I can't think of a reason, either.
> Patch attached to simplify it. It uses the philosop
The existing permissions for LOCK TABLE are surprising/confusing. For
instance, if you have UPDATE privileges on a table, you can lock in any
mode *except* ACCESS SHARE.
drop table x cascade;
drop user u1;
create user u1;
create table x(i int);
grant update on x to u1;
set session aut