On 2019-10-02 07:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-09-30 21:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>>> Instead of AC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE we use our own variant called
>>> PGAC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE that checks for tzname even if other variants were
>>> found first. But since 63bd0db12199c5df04
On 2019-09-30 21:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> Instead of AC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE we use our own variant called
>> PGAC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE that checks for tzname even if other variants were
>> found first. But since 63bd0db12199c5df043e1dea0f2b574f622b3a4c we
>> don't use tzname anymo
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> Instead of AC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE we use our own variant called
> PGAC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE that checks for tzname even if other variants were
> found first. But since 63bd0db12199c5df043e1dea0f2b574f622b3a4c we
> don't use tzname anymore, so we don't need this anymore.
Hmm. I
*tzp = 0;
/* Mark this as *no* time zone available */
tm->tm_isdst = -1;
--
2.23.0
From 5fb3fb899b74f9eb8ba63c23da8a65582b5b2eb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:12:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2
