On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:22:02PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> To make things less confusing, the attached patch renames all the functions
> that are part of the overall signal/interrupt handling system but are *not*
> executed in a signal handler to e.g. ProcessSomething(), rather than
> Ha
On 04/03/2025 21:38, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:22:02PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
To make things less confusing, the attached patch renames all the functions
that are part of the overall signal/interrupt handling system but are *not*
executed in a signal handler to e
4 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Rename some signal and interrupt handling functions for
consistency
The usual pattern for handling a signal is that the signal handler
sets a flag and calls SetLatch(MyLatch) to wake up the process, and
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() or other code that is part of a wait loo
