On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 03:48, Ilia Evdokimov
wrote:
> Let's assume that this check needs to remain, and the length check doesn't
> guarantee anything. However, I'm a bit concerned that there's a NULL check
> here, but it's missing in the clauselist_selectivity_ext() function. For the
> reasons
On 19.8.24 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
Ilia Evdokimov writes:
In the `clause_selectivity_ext()` function, there’s a comment regarding
a NULL clause check that asks, "can this still happen?". I decided to
investigate whether this scenario is still valid.
Here’s what I found after reviewing the relev
Ilia Evdokimov writes:
> In the `clause_selectivity_ext()` function, there’s a comment regarding
> a NULL clause check that asks, "can this still happen?". I decided to
> investigate whether this scenario is still valid.
> Here’s what I found after reviewing the relevant cases:
> - approx_tupl
Hi everyone,
In the `clause_selectivity_ext()` function, there’s a comment regarding
a NULL clause check that asks, "can this still happen?". I decided to
investigate whether this scenario is still valid.
Here’s what I found after reviewing the relevant cases:
- approx_tuple_count(): The fu
