Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 06.09.24 21:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> * I don't really like the new control structure, or rather lack of
>> structure, in hashvalidate. In particular the uncommented
>> s/break/continue/ changes look like typos. They aren't, but can't
>> you do this in a less confusing
at in this patch version and added
some code comments around it.
From 423a2ea6688b2e71b149c6cf2cbef9eb5b280f0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 14:22:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2] Remove hardcoded hash opclass function signature
exceptions
hashvalidate(), which validates
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> hashvalidate(), which validates the signatures of support functions for
> the hash AM, contains several hardcoded exceptions.
> ...
> This patch removes those exceptions by providing new support functions
> that have the proper declared signatures. They internally sha
rt
functions is now dubious. They could continue to exist in the C code as
internal support functions.From c154f024a58f96e8e65db5c621ae34f6d630b84b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 12:08:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded hash opclass function
