On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 05:45:13PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> I mean to remove emode from XLogFileRead, too, but this fix is accidentally
> missed in the previous patch. I attached the updated patch.
This is neat because we don't need to guess how XLogFileRead() should
fail on PANIC, allow things
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:16:01 +0900
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 08:10:43PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > Since 1bb2558046c, XLogFileRead() doesn't use the emode argument.
> > Also, since abf5c5c9a4f, XLogFileReadAnyTLI() is called just once
> > and emode is always DEBUG2. So,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 08:10:43PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> Since 1bb2558046c, XLogFileRead() doesn't use the emode argument.
> Also, since abf5c5c9a4f, XLogFileReadAnyTLI() is called just once
> and emode is always DEBUG2. So, I think we can remove the emode
> argument from these functions. I'
Hi,
Since 1bb2558046c, XLogFileRead() doesn't use the emode argument.
Also, since abf5c5c9a4f, XLogFileReadAnyTLI() is called just once
and emode is always DEBUG2. So, I think we can remove the emode
argument from these functions. I've atached the patch.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo Nagata
di
