On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 03:33, Zhang Mingli wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2022, 14:47 +0800, Richard Guo , wrote:
>
> How about add it to the CF to not lose track of it?
>
> Will add it, thanks~
I guess not losing track of it is only helpful if we do eventually
commit it. Otherwise we would rather lose t
On Sep 16, 2022, 14:47 +0800, Richard Guo , wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 12:39 AM Zhang Mingli wrote:
> > Macro exec_subplan_get_plan is not used anymore.
> > Attach a patch to remove it.
>
> How about add it to the CF to not lose track of it?
Will add it, thanks~
Regards,
Zhang Mingli
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 12:39 AM Zhang Mingli wrote:
> Macro exec_subplan_get_plan is not used anymore.
> Attach a patch to remove it.
>
How about add it to the CF to not lose track of it?
Thanks
Richard
Hi,all
Regards,
Zhang Mingli
On Sep 6, 2022, 10:22 +0800, Richard Guo , wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 1:18 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Zhang Mingli writes:
> > > Macro exec_subplan_get_plan is not used anymore.
> > > Attach a patch to remove it.
> >
> > Hm, I wonder why it's not used anymore. Ma
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 1:18 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Zhang Mingli writes:
> > Macro exec_subplan_get_plan is not used anymore.
> > Attach a patch to remove it.
>
> Hm, I wonder why it's not used anymore. Maybe we no longer need
> that list at all? If we do, should use of the macro be
> re-introduc
Zhang Mingli writes:
> Macro exec_subplan_get_plan is not used anymore.
> Attach a patch to remove it.
Hm, I wonder why it's not used anymore. Maybe we no longer need
that list at all? If we do, should use of the macro be
re-introduced in the accessors?
regards, tom lan
Hi,
Macro exec_subplan_get_plan is not used anymore.
Attach a patch to remove it.
Regards,
Zhang Mingli
vn-0001-exec_subplan_get_plan-is-not-used.patch
Description: Binary data
