On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 12:27, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Rowley writes:
> > (This is pretty minor, but I struggled to ignore it)
> > In RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() a comment claims /* We return our
> > original working copy for caller to play with */. 3 of the 4 possible
> > Bitmapsets follow tha
David Rowley writes:
> (This is pretty minor, but I struggled to ignore it)
> In RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() a comment claims /* We return our
> original working copy for caller to play with */. 3 of the 4 possible
> Bitmapsets follow that comment but for some reason, we make a copy of
> the prim
(This is pretty minor, but I struggled to ignore it)
In RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() a comment claims /* We return our
original working copy for caller to play with */. 3 of the 4 possible
Bitmapsets follow that comment but for some reason, we make a copy of
the primary key attrs before returning.
