Alexander Korotkov writes:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:31 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why is this so bad? It's not like the gist regression test isn't
>> ridiculously expensive already; I'd have expected it to provide
>> darn near 100% coverage for what it's costing in runtime.
> I don't think there
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:31 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> This tells a pretty scary story:
>
> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/access/gist/index.html
>
> In particular, gistbuildbuffers.c is not entered *at all*, and
> gistbuild.c is only 21% covered.
>
> I noticed this after adding an asserti
This tells a pretty scary story:
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/access/gist/index.html
In particular, gistbuildbuffers.c is not entered *at all*, and
gistbuild.c is only 21% covered.
I noticed this after adding an assertion that I expected
gistInitBuildBuffers to fail on, and noneth
