On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:14:38AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> It should, thanks for looking at it. Let's wait a couple of days and
> see if others have any comments. If there are no objections, I'll try
> to commit this one.
And applied.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 01:17:32PM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Shouldn't options be an int? The rest of the patch looks good to me.
It should, thanks for looking at it. Let's wait a couple of days and
see if others have any comments. If there are no objections, I'll try
to commit this one.
-
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> $subject has been mentioned a couple of times, including today:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200902010012.ge1...@paquier.xyz
>
> We have a boolean argument in ReindexStmt to control a concurrent
> run, and we also h
Hi all,
$subject has been mentioned a couple of times, including today:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200902010012.ge1...@paquier.xyz
We have a boolean argument in ReindexStmt to control a concurrent
run, and we also have in parallel of that a bitmask to control the
options of the state
