On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 01:18:34PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I wonder if we should move the noise suppression check closer to
> pg_regress, so that it works also for the "main" pg_regress run, not
> only the one in this new TAP test. As discussed in this thread,
> inconclusively:
Yes, perhaps.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 1:09 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 02:30:13PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > One idea I got to limit the useless output generated is to check the
> > status of the cluster after running the regression test suite as
> > restart_on_crash is disabled b
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 02:30:13PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> One idea I got to limit the useless output generated is to check the
> status of the cluster after running the regression test suite as
> restart_on_crash is disabled by default in Cluster.pm, and avoid any
> follow-up logic in the
Hi all,
(Thomas and Andres in CC.)
Andres has complained a couple of days ago about the quantity of logs
that can be fed into the TAP tests running pg_regress:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220603195318.qk4voicqfdhls...@alap3.anarazel.de
This concerns the TAP tests of pg_upgrade, as wel
