Em ter., 12 de jul. de 2022 às 02:35, David Rowley
escreveu:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 20:48, Matthias van de Meent
> wrote:
> > > 2) v1-002-generation-reduces-memory-consumption.patch
> > > Reduces memory used by struct GenerationBlock, by minus 8 bits,
> >
> > That seems fairly straight-forward
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 20:48, Matthias van de Meent
wrote:
> > 2) v1-002-generation-reduces-memory-consumption.patch
> > Reduces memory used by struct GenerationBlock, by minus 8 bits,
>
> That seems fairly straight-forward -- 8 bytes saved on each page isn't
> a lot, but it's something.
I think
Em seg., 11 de jul. de 2022 às 09:25, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
> Hi,
> Thanks for take a look.
>
> Em seg., 11 de jul. de 2022 às 05:48, Matthias van de Meent <
> boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 03:09, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> >
>> > Let's restart this, to simpli
Hi,
Thanks for take a look.
Em seg., 11 de jul. de 2022 às 05:48, Matthias van de Meent <
boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 03:09, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >
> > Let's restart this, to simplify the review and commit work.
>
> The patchset fails to apply. Could you sen
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 03:09, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> Let's restart this, to simplify the review and commit work.
The patchset fails to apply. Could you send an updated version that
applies to the current master branch?
> Regarding the patches now, we have:
> 1) v1-001-aset-reduces-memory-consum
Em seg., 6 de jun. de 2022 às 21:14, Ranier Vilela
escreveu:
> Em seg., 6 de jun. de 2022 às 20:37, David Rowley
> escreveu:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 07:28, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> > 4) 004-generation-reduces-memory-consumption-BUG.patch
>> > Same to the (2), but with BUG.
>> > It only takes
Em seg., 6 de jun. de 2022 às 20:37, David Rowley
escreveu:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 07:28, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > 4) 004-generation-reduces-memory-consumption-BUG.patch
> > Same to the (2), but with BUG.
> > It only takes a few tweaks to completely remove the field block.
>
> > This fails with
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 07:28, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> 4) 004-generation-reduces-memory-consumption-BUG.patch
> Same to the (2), but with BUG.
> It only takes a few tweaks to completely remove the field block.
> This fails with make check.
> I couldn't figure out why it doesn't work with 16 bits (st
HI hackers,
I thought it would be better to start a new thread to discuss.
While working with sorting patch, and read others threads,
I have some ideas to reduces memory consumption by aset and generation
memory modules.
I have done basic benchmarks, and it seems to improve performance.
I think i
