On 30.08.22 00:13, Andres Freund wrote:
1) For make based builds, all libraries that are built with MODULES rather
than MODULES_big have the wrong "FILETYPE", because Makefile.win32 checks
$(shlib), which is only set for MODULES_big.
This used to be even more widely wrong until recen
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 3:26 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-08-29 15:13:14 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > 1) For make based builds, all libraries that are built with MODULES
> rather
> >than MODULES_big have the wrong "FILETYPE", because Makefile.win32
> checks
> >$(shlib), whi
Hi,
On 2022-08-29 15:13:14 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> 1) For make based builds, all libraries that are built with MODULES rather
>than MODULES_big have the wrong "FILETYPE", because Makefile.win32 checks
>$(shlib), which is only set for MODULES_big.
>
>This used to be even more wid
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 11:22 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-09-01 22:34:07 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > 4) We include the date, excluding 0 for some mysterious reason, in the
> > > version
> > >number. This seems to unnecessarily contribute to making the build
> not
> > >r
Hi,
On 2022-09-01 22:34:07 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 4) We include the date, excluding 0 for some mysterious reason, in the
> > version
> >number. This seems to unnecessarily contribute to making the build not
> >reproducible. Hails from long ago:
> >
> >commit 9af932075098bd3c14
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:13 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few things about the windows resource files we generate
>
> 1) For make based builds, all libraries that are built with MODULES rather
>than MODULES_big have the wrong "FILETYPE", because Makefile.win32
> checks
>$(shlib),
