On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:27:56PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> That's an "expanded" version of 0008.
Okay, thanks.
> It doesn't include 0012, which is primarily about fixing incorrect references
> to "index expressions" that should refer to stats expressions. Naturally 0012
> also uses the phr
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:15:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 07:50:02PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Attached is an updated patch fixing more of the same.
>
> Does this include everything you have spotted, as well as everything
> from the previous patches 0008 and
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 07:50:02PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch fixing more of the same.
Does this include everything you have spotted, as well as everything
from the previous patches 0008 and 0012 posted?
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 06:04:02PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Sep-27, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > The use
> > of "statistic", "statistics" and "statistics object" in 0008 and 0012
> > is indeed inconsistent. The latter term is the most used, but it
> > sounds a bit weird to me even i
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 06:04:02PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Initially we just used "statistic" as a noun, which IIRC was already
> grammatically wrong (but I didn't know that and I think Tomas didn't
> either); later at some point when discussing how to use that noun in
> plural we realized t
On 2021-Sep-27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The use
> of "statistic", "statistics" and "statistics object" in 0008 and 0012
> is indeed inconsistent. The latter term is the most used, but it
> sounds a bit weird to me even if it refers to the DDL object
> manipulated. Simply using "statistics" woul
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:24:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, thanks for compiling all these. The two changes committed were
> the only user-visible changes, which is why I have hastened this part
> to include those fixes. The rest could just go on HEAD.
I have looked at the full set,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:01:17PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Thanks Michael for applying fixes to user-facing docs (I hadn't realized that
> the 2nd one needed to be backpatched).
Yes, thanks for compiling all these. The two changes committed were
the only user-visible changes, which is why I
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 04:58:27PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> A compilation of fixes for master.
Thanks Michael for applying fixes to user-facing docs (I hadn't realized that
the 2nd one needed to be backpatched).
This fixes an file I failed to include in the "recheck" patch and more typos
for
