On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 04:39:08PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-19 17:53:09 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I also meant to also attach it.
>
> Is the patch actually independent of the other patches in your stack?
Yes - I rearranged it that way for this thread.
However, it's best ser
On 2/24/22 20:17, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 07:00:54AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2/19/22 18:53, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 05:41:49PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I rebased and fixed the check-guc script to work, made it work with vpath
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 07:00:54AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2/19/22 18:53, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 05:41:49PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >> I rebased and fixed the check-guc script to work, made it work with vpath
> >> builds, and cleaned it up some.
> > I also
On 2/19/22 18:53, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 05:41:49PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> I rebased and fixed the check-guc script to work, made it work with vpath
>> builds, and cleaned it up some.
> I also meant to also attach it.
This is going to break a bunch of stuff as wr
Hi,
On 2022-02-19 17:53:09 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I also meant to also attach it.
Is the patch actually independent of the other patches in your stack?
I like this concept a lot:
- I've had to use a wrapper around individual tap tests for meson, just to set
the CWD etc.
- Being able t
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 05:41:49PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I rebased and fixed the check-guc script to work, made it work with vpath
> builds, and cleaned it up some.
I also meant to also attach it.
> This (and other) patches ran here.
> https://github.com/justinpryzby/postgres/runs/5261323
