On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:46:01 +0530
Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:01 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:09 AM Amit Kapila
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached patch with updated commit message based on suggestions. I am
> > > planning to commit this tomorrow un
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:01 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:09 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > Attached patch with updated commit message based on suggestions. I am
> > planning to commit this tomorrow unless there are more comments.
> >
>
> While testing the patch on back vers
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:09 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 9:16 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:27:43 +0100
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > On 2019-12-16 11:11, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > I agree that this is a timing issue. I al
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 9:16 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:27:43 +0100
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > On 2019-12-16 11:11, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > I agree that this is a timing issue. I also don't see a way to write
> > > a reproducible test for this. Howeve
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:27:43 +0100
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-12-16 11:11, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I agree that this is a timing issue. I also don't see a way to write
> > a reproducible test for this. However, I could reproduce it via
> > debugger consistently by following the below step
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:10:07 +0530
vignesh C wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:30 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:34:38 +0100
> > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2019-11-05 17:
On 2019-12-16 11:11, Amit Kapila wrote:
I agree that this is a timing issue. I also don't see a way to write
a reproducible test for this. However, I could reproduce it via
debugger consistently by following the below steps. I have updated a
few comments and commit messages in the attached pat
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:10 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> I have made changes to fix the comment provided. The patch for the
> same is attached. Could not add a test case for this scenario is based
> on timing issue.
> Thoughts?
>
I agree that this is a timing issue. I also don't see a way to write
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:30 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:34:38 +0100
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > On 2019-11-05 17:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > > > My best bet so far is that lo
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:34:38 +0100
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > On 2019-11-05 17:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > > My best bet so far is that logicalrep_relmap_invalidate_cb is not called
> > > after the DDL on th
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:34:38 +0100
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-11-05 17:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > My best bet so far is that logicalrep_relmap_invalidate_cb is not called
> > after the DDL on the subscriber so the relmap cache is not invalidated. So
> > we end up with slot->
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:47:02 +0900 (JST)
Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:28:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote in
> > Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais writes:
> > > When investigating for the bug reported in thread "logical replication -
> > > negative bitmapset member not allowed", I fou
On 2019-11-05 17:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
My best bet so far is that logicalrep_relmap_invalidate_cb is not called after
the DDL on the subscriber so the relmap cache is not invalidated. So we end up
with slot->tts_tupleDescriptor->natts superior than rel->remoterel->natts in
slot_s
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:28:38 -0400
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais writes:
> > When investigating for the bug reported in thread "logical replication -
> > negative bitmapset member not allowed", I found a way to seg fault
> > postgresql only when cassert is enabled.
> > ...
> > I
At Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:28:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote in
> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais writes:
> > When investigating for the bug reported in thread "logical replication -
> > negative bitmapset member not allowed", I found a way to seg fault
> > postgresql
> > only when cassert is enabled.
> > ..
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais writes:
> When investigating for the bug reported in thread "logical replication -
> negative bitmapset member not allowed", I found a way to seg fault postgresql
> only when cassert is enabled.
> ...
> I hadn't time to digg further yet. However, I don't understand why
16 matches
Mail list logo