Fabien COELHO writes:
>> |...] So I'll mark this ready for committer.
> Ok, thanks for the review.
LGTM, pushed.
regards, tom lane
Hello Yoshikazu,
|...] So I'll mark this ready for committer.
Ok, thanks for the review.
--
Fabien.
On Wed, July 24, 2019 at 7:02 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > but I have one question. Is it better adding any check like if(maxsock
> > != -1) before the select?
> >
> > else/* no explicit delay, select without timeout */
> > {
> >nsocks = select(maxsock + 1, &input_mask, NULL, NU
Hello Yoshikazu,
I could not reproduce this issue on head, but I confirm on 11.2.
I could reproduce the stuck on 11.4.
Attached is a fix to apply on pg11.
I confirm the stuck doesn't happen after applying your patch.
Ok, thanks for the feedback.
+ /* under throttling we
Hi Fabien,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:17 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >> echo 'select 1' > select.sql
> >>
> >> while /bin/true; do
> >> pgbench -n -f select.sql -R 1000 -j 8 -c 8 -T 1 > /dev/null 2>&1;
> >> date;
> >> done;
> >
> > Indeed. I'll look at it over the weekend.
> >
> >> So I guess thi
Hello Tomas,
So I guess this is a bug in 12788ae49e1933f463bc59a6efe46c4a01701b76, or
one of the other commits touching this part of the code.
I could not reproduce this issue on head, but I confirm on 11.2.
AFAICS on head it's fixed by 3bac77c48f166b9024a5ead984df73347466ae12
Thanks for
On 3/15/19 5:16 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>>> echo 'select 1' > select.sql
>>>
>>> while /bin/true; do
>>> pgbench -n -f select.sql -R 1000 -j 8 -c 8 -T 1 > /dev/null 2>&1;
>>> date;
>>> done;
>>
>> Indeed. I'll look at it over the weekend.
>>
>>> So I guess this is a bug in 12788ae49e1933f463b
echo 'select 1' > select.sql
while /bin/true; do
pgbench -n -f select.sql -R 1000 -j 8 -c 8 -T 1 > /dev/null 2>&1;
date;
done;
Indeed. I'll look at it over the weekend.
So I guess this is a bug in 12788ae49e1933f463bc59a6efe46c4a01701b76, or
one of the other commits touching this part of
echo 'select 1' > select.sql
while /bin/true; do
pgbench -n -f select.sql -R 1000 -j 8 -c 8 -T 1 > /dev/null 2>&1;
date;
done;
Indeed. I'll look at it over the weekend.
So I guess this is a bug in 12788ae49e1933f463bc59a6efe46c4a01701b76, or
one of the other commits touching this part of
