On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:10 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 04:15:22PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Is there a reason the "only" is missing from the -s option? AFAIK that's
> > what it means, so the attached patch should be correct?
>
> I cannot think of a reason. This
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 04:15:22PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is there a reason the "only" is missing from the -s option? AFAIK that's
> what it means, so the attached patch should be correct?
I cannot think of a reason. This seems historically inherited from
pg_dump, and the option got adde
