> On 1 Mar 2022, at 09:44, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> I propose a reduced patch that just removes the "bits" display, since that is
> redundant with the "cipher"
No objections from me.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On 28.02.22 16:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
On 28 Feb 2022, at 12:56, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
On 28.02.22 11:50, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
How about making it show "compression: on" if compression is on, but
nothing in the common "off" case?
That would work for me.
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> On 28 Feb 2022, at 12:56, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>> On 28.02.22 11:50, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>>> How about making it show "compression: on" if compression is on, but
>>> nothing in the common "off" case?
>> That would work for me.
> On POLA grounds I wo
> On 28 Feb 2022, at 12:56, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> On 28.02.22 11:50, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>>> This was originally done, but all client side changes reverted as there
>>> still
>>> are server versions in production which allow compression.
>> How ab
On 28.02.22 12:21, Michael Paquier wrote:
What about that making the information
shown version-aware? I would choose to show the compression part only
for server versions where it is settable.
That might lead to confusing results if you are not connecting to
something that is a stock PostgreS
On 28.02.22 11:50, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
On 28 Feb 2022, at 10:02, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
Since support for SSL compression has been removed from PostgreSQL, it
doesn't seem sensible to display it anymore.
This was originally done, but all client sid
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:50:01AM +, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 28 Feb 2022, at 10:02, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>> This was originally done, but all client side changes reverted as there still
>> are server versions in production which allow compress
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 28 Feb 2022, at 10:02, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>
>> Since support for SSL compression has been removed from PostgreSQL, it
>> doesn't seem sensible to display it anymore.
>
> This was originally done, but all client side changes reverted as there still
> are s
> On 28 Feb 2022, at 10:02, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> Since support for SSL compression has been removed from PostgreSQL, it
> doesn't seem sensible to display it anymore.
This was originally done, but all client side changes reverted as there still
are server versions in production which all
