Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-02-11 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2025-01-31 18:21:54 -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > On January 31, 2025 5:22:43 PM EST, Robert Treat wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:25 AM Andres Freund wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2025-01-30 21:24:05 -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > >> > On January 30, 2025 8:55:36 PM EST, Tom Lane

Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-01-31 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On January 31, 2025 5:22:43 PM EST, Robert Treat wrote: >On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:25 AM Andres Freund wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 2025-01-30 21:24:05 -0500, Andres Freund wrote: >> > On January 30, 2025 8:55:36 PM EST, Tom Lane wrote: >> > >Andres Freund writes: >> > >> While working on p

Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-01-31 Thread Robert Treat
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:25 AM Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2025-01-30 21:24:05 -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > > On January 30, 2025 8:55:36 PM EST, Tom Lane wrote: > > >Andres Freund writes: > > >> While working on polishing the AIO patchset, I was trying to figure out > > >> where > >

Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund writes: > I don't really know what to do about the "IO" abbreviation. The other sections > un-abbreviate abbreviations, but I suspect that Input/Output will be less > informative than IO to most... I'd lean towards writing "I/O", but it's not a point I'd quibble over.

Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-01-31 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2025-01-30 21:24:05 -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > On January 30, 2025 8:55:36 PM EST, Tom Lane wrote: > >Andres Freund writes: > >> While working on polishing the AIO patchset, I was trying to figure out > >> where > >> to fit the new GUCs. So far I had a new "top-level" #--- style secti

Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-01-30 Thread Andres Freund
Hi On January 30, 2025 8:55:36 PM EST, Tom Lane wrote: >Andres Freund writes: >> While working on polishing the AIO patchset, I was trying to figure out where >> to fit the new GUCs. So far I had a new "top-level" #--- style section named >> "WIP AIO GUC docs" which I suspect you all won't let m

Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

2025-01-30 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund writes: > While working on polishing the AIO patchset, I was trying to figure out where > to fit the new GUCs. So far I had a new "top-level" #--- style section named > "WIP AIO GUC docs" which I suspect you all won't let me get away with. > There is an existing (sub-)section which a